Barack Hussein Obama

There’s been a big flap in Ohio because an Ohio radio talk show guy named Bill Cunningham emceed a John McCain rally and several times referred to Senator Obama using his full name, Barack Hussein Obama.

The Democrat base and their far left, loony, socialist-leaning, uber liberal, redistribute-the-wealth friends got their shorts in a twist. Somehow, using Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name gave them a huge wedgie and they didn’t like it.

Why not? It’s his name. On his birth certificate. Why shouldn’t anyone be allowed to use it?

I’m being naive. Of course we know why — because it’s the same name as the brutal dictator we overthrew in Iraq and it’s a Muslim name. In case anyone hasn’t heard, a small but significant percentage of the Muslim population wants to destroy us. The Obama supporters are rightly defensive about the middle name “Hussein.” In today’s poltical climate, I’d be defensive about it, too.

So, why shouldn’t we be reminded that he’s “Hussein” as we go through the campaign?

“Boo-hoo, it’s unfair. He’s not responsible for his name. It’s not his fault.”

So what! It’s part of his package, like being black. That’s not his fault either, but the Democratics don’t miss an opportunity to remind us about it, as if we couldn’t see for ourselves.

That said, too effin’ bad. If you enter politics, or any high-profile, celebrity making profession, your name comes along for the ride, along with your family history, finances, medical condition, extra-marital affairs or anything else a friend or enemy can use to bring you up or shoot you down. “Hussein” is fair game. We can use it, abuse it, say it, spell it, admire it, make fun of it and, what the Democratics are most afraid of — think twice about it.

My friend, Dave in DC, an eminently intelligent and reasonable man who sadly likes Barack Hussein Obama, observes that people are using the name as an insult.

Probably.

The Democratics and MoveOn faithful are certainly making an effort to make us all perceive its use as an insult, effectively co-opting its use. It’s a kind of censorship by acclamation. It’s the same principle the left invoked when they launched into high dudgeon and told us that calling Indians Indians was bad and insulting. The Indians didn’t seem to mind until the touchy-feely crowd kept telling them and us that it was insulting and their well paid spokesmen deposited their gambling proceeds and said, “Uh, oh, yeah, that’s right. We don’t like it.”

Even if it is an insult, that’s my point. We’re free to do with Hussein whatever we want. It’s his NAME. Hillary’s ass is as wide as the Lincoln Tunnel entrance and referring to it is also an insult. Too bad. It’s her ass. Making fun of her cackle, that sounds like it’s coming from a chicken being strangled while trying to lay a square egg, is also an insult. It’s insulting to Larry “Wide Stance” Craig to laugh at his clumsy pick-up technique in a Minneapolis airport bathroom, but they’re his shoes. We’re only responding to what they give us.

Cunningham apologists are bleating that he was justified is inserting “Hussein” because we often use presidential middle names — Franklin Delano Roosevelt, John Fitzgerald Kennedy or Richard Milhous Nixon, but that’s a cop out. We and he use Hussein because we’re aware of its negative connotations and the potential power it might have in the voting booth. The left is aware of it as well, which is why they’re attacking people who use it.

Tough tittie, Barack Hussein Obama. We’re just dancing with the name you brung. You don’t like it, too bad. It’s part of the game. How you handle it can be illustrative of how you’ll handle the shitty blips that come up in Presidential life.

As a postscript, the Huffington Post the other day published a story suggesting in ominous tones that Senator McCain’s eligibility as a candidate might be in jeopardy because he was — get this — born in Panama. If this isn’t as much B.S. as “Hussein” I don’t know what is. Courts have ruled many times that if one parent is an American you could be born on the space shuttle and you’d still be an American.

Being born in Panama is part of McCain’s package. It’s a bogus issue, but that didn’t stop HuffPo from trying to make a little hay out of it. Both sides play this game and conservatives shouldn’t be reluctant to use every weapon to keep the left out of the White House. The other side won’t be.

Barack Hussein Obama. Barack Hussein Obama. I like it.

kick it on ConservativeKicks.com

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Netscape
  • Bumpzee
  • RawSugar
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

  1. Joseph
    February 29th, 2008 | 9:22 am

    “Barack Hussein Obama”

    Yeah, I like it too. Can’t wait to see Barack Hussein Obama clean McCain’s clock in the general.

  2. February 29th, 2008 | 10:20 am

    You’re linking to the wrong story with your kickit button on Conservative Kicks. You need to change it to the right one or I’ll have to delete the kick. I don’t think you’re trying to spoof anything (it’s not like conservativekicks.com drives a lot of traffic), but we have to be consistent where that’s concerned.

    (And if you haven’t figured it out, I’m a moderator there. :) )

  3. sdf
    February 29th, 2008 | 12:11 pm

    you’re an asshat

  4. February 29th, 2008 | 12:45 pm

    The attempts to feign plausibility while employing “Hussein” to imply connections between Senator Obama and fundamentalist Islamic extremists fall apart when compared to behaviors by those writers and/or speakers in analogous situations. Political candidates are referred to by any serious commentator in whatever way the campaigns prefer. It’s respectful not to refer to Senator Clinton as Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton even though she employed Rodham deliberately earlier this decade. Willard chose to be known as Mitt Romney, and that wish was respected. Some years back now, J. Danforth Quayle was greeted by the pundits and columnists on both ends of the political spectrum as “Dan” which was obviously a political decision to make him sound less snobbish (or more folksy and normal.) How many voters today know that Senator McCain’s middle name is Sidney, or that he’s John Sidney McCain III?

    Why don’t we hear these full names? Primarily because it’s not respectful. We all know that. We also know why you advocate this disrespect, we recognize the smug “you can’t touch me” you project. Remember the parable of the Emperor’s New Clothes?

    Employing a longer form than the campaigns are currently marketing would ignore the wishes of a well-known politician, among other reasons. I doubt McCain is any more embarrassed by Sidney than Obama is by Hussein, surely both were teased by childhood tormenters. But pundits and present detractors are aware - as we are - that in certain minds it’s possible hearing Hussein repeated enough times might raise doubts, particularly since it resonates with slanderous anonymous viral smears already circulating.

    Frankly, logical investigation dictates asking further why any speaker (or writer) would change their use to consistently include Senator Obama’s middle name at this juncture, not just why they’d do so at all, and the only plausible conclusion is a petty attempt to undermine his candidacy, however slightly - a candidacy which seems otherwise to be attracting more followers almost every minute. Applying Occam’s Razor one concludes that protests that Hussein “is” the Senator’s middle name, no matter how straight-faced they are delivered, are transparent, and shamefully disingenuous in this context.

    Even Karl Rove conceded that to employ this tactic sounds like “a rallying cry for bigots.”

    Because it is.

  5. March 4th, 2008 | 7:11 am

    Lefty,

    Thanks for your well thought out observations.

  6. March 22nd, 2008 | 3:06 pm

    HIS EXACT BIRTHTIME ON HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE,
    THAT IS THE ONE THING THAT IS MISSING
    THE AMERICAN PUBLIC NEEDS TO KNOW THAT!

Leave a reply