<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mangled Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bonilogue.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=85" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bonilogue.com/?p=85</link>
	<description>Web log of John Boni</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:39:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: juliette</title>
		<link>http://www.bonilogue.com/?p=85&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>juliette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bonilogue.com/2006/06/11/mangled-words/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very true. But is that specific to television? I remember my father complaining of the same thing happening in French newspapers (but, French in general actually). The emerging use of the word &quot;jeune&quot; (young) as a noun even though it is an adjective. The excessive use of &quot;formidable&quot; (terrific). The use of &quot;absolument&quot; (absolutely) and &quot;tout a fait&quot; (entirely) instead of simply &quot;oui&quot; (yes). He was claiming that things were different before, that people used to take better care of respecting language and the meaning of words, and I believed him. But one day I read something from someone in roman times who was having exactly the same complaints. And one day I heard my uncle replying to my father&#039;s complaint that this is the very nature of living languages. They evolve. As a biologist, I tend to agree with my uncle. If languages didn&#039;t evolve, they would be dead. And, if uncontrolled, there is no reason for this evolution to change things towards the most efficient or the most logical. Current French, for example, is a very good example of the amazing lack of logic that can creep into an evolving language. To start with, we actually use for negation a double negation, which in theory should be an affirmation (Je ne veux pas -&gt; I do not want not). The most extreme example I know, for spoken language: when we are astonished, and really wonder what something is or are angry (say, when you catch the dog pooping in the living room), we say &quot;qu&#039;est-ce que c&#039;est que ca?&quot;, which translates into &quot;what is this that that is that that?&quot;. How much better can one do? I think that its great lack of logic is what makes the French language one of the most difficult to learn.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, we can consciously control the evolution of languages, to make sure that they do not get too messy, and clean them up once in a while, just like the Spanish did (or at least I think I heard they did). Yes, languages might need to be cleaned sometimes. Just like any living thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. But is that specific to television? I remember my father complaining of the same thing happening in French newspapers (but, French in general actually). The emerging use of the word &#8220;jeune&#8221; (young) as a noun even though it is an adjective. The excessive use of &#8220;formidable&#8221; (terrific). The use of &#8220;absolument&#8221; (absolutely) and &#8220;tout a fait&#8221; (entirely) instead of simply &#8220;oui&#8221; (yes). He was claiming that things were different before, that people used to take better care of respecting language and the meaning of words, and I believed him. But one day I read something from someone in roman times who was having exactly the same complaints. And one day I heard my uncle replying to my father&#8217;s complaint that this is the very nature of living languages. They evolve. As a biologist, I tend to agree with my uncle. If languages didn&#8217;t evolve, they would be dead. And, if uncontrolled, there is no reason for this evolution to change things towards the most efficient or the most logical. Current French, for example, is a very good example of the amazing lack of logic that can creep into an evolving language. To start with, we actually use for negation a double negation, which in theory should be an affirmation (Je ne veux pas -&gt; I do not want not). The most extreme example I know, for spoken language: when we are astonished, and really wonder what something is or are angry (say, when you catch the dog pooping in the living room), we say &#8220;qu&#8217;est-ce que c&#8217;est que ca?&#8221;, which translates into &#8220;what is this that that is that that?&#8221;. How much better can one do? I think that its great lack of logic is what makes the French language one of the most difficult to learn.</p>
<p>But, we can consciously control the evolution of languages, to make sure that they do not get too messy, and clean them up once in a while, just like the Spanish did (or at least I think I heard they did). Yes, languages might need to be cleaned sometimes. Just like any living thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaLisa</title>
		<link>http://www.bonilogue.com/?p=85&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaLisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bonilogue.com/2006/06/11/mangled-words/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey JohnBoni!  I&#039;m both too cheap and too lazy to actually hunt down and buy today&#039;s Herald Sun, but laughed out loud when I read the last paragraph of &quot;Mangled Words&quot; on the BoniLogue (great &quot;word&quot;, btw)!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JohnBoni!  I&#8217;m both too cheap and too lazy to actually hunt down and buy today&#8217;s Herald Sun, but laughed out loud when I read the last paragraph of &#8220;Mangled Words&#8221; on the BoniLogue (great &#8220;word&#8221;, btw)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
