April 23, 2008
Let Them Eat Biofuel
![]() |
Observers of recent food riots have wondering who’ll be the environmental Marie Antoinette when the hyper-emotional, carbon footprint panic bites the asses of the global warmer community and a hungry public stands there with bloated bellies, scratching their mosquito-enclircled heads and wondering, “What the f**k?”
When the hungry people of the world become, uh, fed up, with the high cost of food, when they can’t buy enough food even if they have money to buy it and when they’re starving because there’s not enough food to be had, whose head should they chop off?
My pick — Al Gore, with Laurie David standing in the cutter’s deck.
It seems that the conversion of arable farm land from food to biofuel is reducing the supply and price of many edibles. The government is force-feeding ethanol production upon us, as inefficient a production process as wrapping toilet paper rolls by hand. Corn prices have doubled in the past few years and the poor in Mexico are finding their tortillas held hostage to the white, guilt-ridden, well fed, environmental loonies and zealots of the American and European radical left.
Instead of being grateful that they’ll have access to cheap biofuels for the cars they’re too poor to own, Mexicans are complaining that they’re too poor to afford tortillas. Jesus! How spoiled can people be? It’s not surprising then that they did the only thing a hungry people left for them to do and that’s to riot.
And riot they did, except for those who switched careers and started working for the drug industry, and I don’t mean diabetes pills.
![]() |
Food riots also erupted in Haiti, Morocco, Egypt, Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, Mauritania, Cameroon, Senegal, Uzbekistan and Yemen. The riots may be effective, but they need a Marie Antoinette and a cadre of aristocrats to bump off before the climate change pimps will come to their senses. I doubt that’ll happen, though. There’s a lot of money to be made in CO2.
Riots haven’t yet occurred in Vietnam, Cambodia, India or Egypt, but these countries have all placed restrictions on their rice exports to drive down domestic prices. Pakistan has reinstated food rationing. Likewise, California. Stores like Costo and other supermarkets are rationing food products. Rice, corn and flour are scarce because …. hmmmm, what could be the reason for that?
Over Passover, Jews nationwide had difficulty locating kosher-for-Passover margarine. One reason for the shortage was the scarcity of cottonseed oil because some U.S. farmers have abandoned planting cotton for — you guessed it, corn, the price of which climbed to meet the needs of ethanol manufacturers. Who can blame the farmer for deserting one crop for a more profitable one?
Green living has swept the country. Many parts of the “I-have-plenty-to-eat-world”advocate green living with a passion, a passion that is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available. Check out Patrick Michaels informative article on the mess that is the method used to measure so-called global warming.
Supposedly climate-friendly policies in the United States and the European Union — subsidizing the production and consumption of such renewable biofuels as ethanol and biodiesel — have diverted such crops as corn, soybeans and palm oil from food to fuel. This, in turn, has increased prices for food worldwide at a time when the highly populous and newly prosperous East and South Asian countries would like to eat.
In Togo, restaurants that once served huge balls of traditional corn meal with soup have reduced these dumplings to the size of tennis balls and are charging twice as much.
The unintended consequences of climate-change remedies can lead to greater poverty, starvation and disease, as well as widespread ecological destruction.
We will go from being the world’s breadbasket to its biofuel basket
Survival of the planet is the Godly reason for the environmental madness that reduces the amount of available food while raising its price but my guess is more Swiftian.
Survival of the fittest.
Extreme Environmentalism is an acceptable way of thinning the population without resorting to war or depending upon random, unreliable natural disasters like tsunamis and volcano eruptions. Better food for cars means less food for bellies. Less food for bellies means starvation. Starvation means fewer people. Fewer people is better for the planet.
In London, the World Food Program yesterday on, ironically, Earth Day, announced that a “silent tsunami” of hunger is sweeping the country. Environmentalists are eager to save the planet and have no compunction about sacrificing people to do it.
These well meaning people might as well get used to banging their heads against walls. The left doesn’t want the world fed, they want the world the way they want it – greener than Robin Hood’s tights, government’s sword hanging over our heads, everyone but their income redistributed and a thriving community of victims to patronize and control.
Survival of the fittest, Darwinism at work.
Okay, I don’t really think the left wants to wipe people out. But they sure don’t seem to have their best help-us-make-it-through-the-day interests at heart. And I’d still like to see some of their heads under that blade – metaphorically speaking.



Comments(5)
John !
This is not a comment about your story but rather a hello. You sent me a message on WA and I’m not familiar enough with the place to know if it went through or not. Was very happy to get your note.
We’re back in California now. I want to send you the contact info but couldn’t figure out how to send you a private message on your blog. But you have my email address now.
Since this is a public comment I suppose I should, you know, make a comment. You’ve still got the greatest smile ever.
There. That’s my comment. Over and out.
Chris Dunn
John -
You’re aware that President Bush is a HUGE endorser of ethanol and biofuels in general, right?
Cause oddly enough, I don’t see any mention of him here. Otherwise, I agree entirely with your post.
Thanks, Arthur.
It’s good we cleared the air like we did. I was relieved that you didn’t end your post with some snotty remark like:
I look forward to this new era in our cyber relationship.
John -
Cool.
I mean really, really cool.
Arthur,
Thanks again. It’s good to be on better terms.
Unfortunately, I’m not part of what is, I guess, a middle-Eastern culture where the host treats a guest with utmost respect and consideration no matter how abhorrent the guest might be or behave. If I don’t like someone, or in some cases, despise them, I just don’t want them around at all and happily kick them out.
I’m glad that won’t apply here.
All best …
How’s that office job you mentioned a while ago doing? Getting any writing done? Anything close to selling that we can all get excited about?
JB